Tag Archives: homelessness

News Round-Up: Sequestration and the Housing Shortage

Last week, NLIHC released Housing Spotlight: America’s Affordable Housing Shortage, and How to End It. It’s a startling look into the depth of the affordable housing shortage facing extremely low income households, providing data at both the national and state levels showing the amount of housing needed is far greater than what is affordable and available to the lowest income renters.

Prior to the release of our report, HUD released a summary of its report to Congress on the worst case housing needs. As the Seattle Medium notes, the report shows 8.48 million renter households experiencing the worst case housing needs– severely unaffordable housing, substandard housing conditions or both– which represents a 43.5% increase since 2007.

The local CBS affiliate in Phoenix reports that due to the shortage of affordable rentals available to the lowest income people, three out of four of these renters will spend more than half of their incomes on housing costs.

Foster’s Daily Democrat in New Hampshire reports on the HUD worst case needs report, and notes that while rents in the state are increasing, the data shows that vacancy rates are down, adding another layer of difficulty for lower income renters.

While the data continue to show that low income renters face a severe housing shortage, the federal programs that help the poorest Americans with their housing needs are now subject to deep cuts. As the New York Times reports, sequestration, which took effect Friday, will result in hundreds of thousands of very poor households losing their housing assistance and becoming at risk of homelessness.

Leave a comment

Filed under News round-up

Talk of the Town: A Blunt Instrument

Something very serious is about to hit the United States, and it’s not a stray meteorite from outer space. It’s got the potential to impact the life of every American, but it’s going to hit low income people hardest. And as much as everyone wants to stop it, no one seems to know how.

What’s this very serious thing? It’s sequestration.

These automatic, across-the-board cuts to federal programs were supposed to be the stick that got lawmakers to agree on a more reasonable deficit reduction plan. Instead, Members of Congress and President Obama have continued to disagree over how to avert sequestration, locking heads over whether or not to include new revenue as well as cuts in a plan to balance the budget. The New York Times notes that President Obama already agreed to $1.5 trillion in spending cuts last year, making it high time to consider new revenue as an alternative to ten years of indiscriminate budget cuts.

Those on the far right have a different opinion. The Washington Post reports that a group called Americans for Prosperity are pushing House Republicans to allow sequestration to move forward. If you are a lawmaker in favor of limited government, they say, you should support the sequester.

So what’s the potential impact on housing? Reuters reports from the Senate Appropriations hearing on sequestration Thursday that HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan warned that cuts to HUD would have a tremendous impact not just on housing, but on the financial future of the nation as a whole due to the impact of housing on the economy. Secretary Donovan called sequestration a “blunt instrument,” and said that if sequestration took place, hundreds of thousands of low income and formerly homeless people would lose their access to housing they can afford, and the Super Storm Sandy recovery effort would be threatened.

Do you think Congress can act in time to avert sequestration? What alternative to sequestration do you want your Members of Congress to support? What do you think housing advocates can do to support better alternatives? Let’s talk about it in the comments.

2 Comments

Filed under Talk of the Town

News Round-Up: Desperate Measures

Poor-quality housing conditions are often a fact of life for the poorest Americans. Two stories this week show the impact this reality has on families, and the different ways the story plays out in private and public housing.

On this blog, Senior Vice President for Policy and Research Linda Couch writes about family friends living in poverty and struggling for stability. Forced to leave the room they rented due to living conditions deemed unsafe by the local government, this family is hungry and nearly homeless. Linda knows all too well the conditions this family faces in the rental market, and wonders if there is a better life in their future.

Often, residents of federally assisted housing live in poor condition similar to their low income counterparts in private rental housing. As an article in the Tampa Bay Times explains, years of cuts to federal spending on public housing means public housing agencies often don’t have the funds necessary to operate and adequately maintain their housing. In response, HUD launched the Rental Assistance Demonstration, which allows housing agencies to seek out private investors to raise the capital necessary to maintain high-quality housing. Housing officials and advocates alike acknowledge the risks of private funding, but with housing need growing and budget cuts a fact of life for HUD-funded programs, many housing agencies see no other choice.

Leave a comment

Filed under News round-up

Is homelessness something we can accept?

You’d have to have a pretty cold heart not to be moved by this story: an empathetic doctor and a homeless inventor partner together to launch the homeless man’s invention, changing both their lives in the process.

The story of Mike Williams, who became homeless after a series of financial setbacks, reminds us that as much as we’d like to believe otherwise, none of us are immune from personal disaster. Even for those with great talent or success, like Mr. Williams, hardship or homelessness could be just a short run of bad luck away.

The invention in question is a six-foot by six-foot pod with a chemical toilet, a “secure, safe place for the homeless and people [who] are displaced in society.”

Providing a safe place for people to live is a laudable goal. And no doubt, Mr. Williams has the skill and ingenuity to create something truly useful to many people. But a so-called survival pod is not a solution to homelessness.

Homelessness is not a permanent aspect of our society, nor is it a logical, unavoidable side-effect of capitalism that we must all come to accept. We should not strive to make homelessness easier for people; we should strive to end it. Homelessness exists because the housing available in our communities is too expensive for low-wage workers, seniors and people with disabilities to afford, and because some people have additional personal challenges like mental illness or domestic violence that make maintaining their housing even harder.

Survival pods, like homeless shelters, are at best an interim solution. What is necessary is for the supply of housing affordable to the lowest income Americans to increase. It is not complicated, and it can be done. Our proposal is to fund this increase through a modification of the home mortgage interest deduction that will make home ownership tax benefits available to more middle and lower income home owners, while simultaneously producing savings that can be invested in the production and preservation of housing affordable to extremely low income renters.

When it was signed into law in 2008, the National Housing Trust Fund was a beacon of hope for housing and homelessness advocates. The financial crisis of that year postponed its initial funding. But the country’s financial climate- and its political climate- have changed. Our conversations with Senators and their staffs have convinced us that the mortgage interest deduction as we know it is not long for this world. We have the chance, this year, to influence this rare and welcome debate. Our hope, and our effort, is renewed.

Mr. Williams, like all the rest of us, deserves the dignity of a safe, decent, affordable place to call home. Join with us in support of housing policy that will get us there.

3 Comments

Filed under Policy Focus

News Round-Up: Fighting Words

It’s time to fight for the National Housing Trust Fund.

So says the New York Times in an editorial this weekend citing the shortage of safe, decent housing affordable to the lowest income Americans as “one of America’s most vexing problems.”

Vexing is right. As National Low Income Housing Coalition analysis shows, there are only 30 units of housing affordable and available to every 100 extremely low income renters. This absolute shortage of housing has persisted and, in fact, increased over the years. The result is that these extremely low income renters are renting housing they can’t afford- the only housing available to them. And after paying for rent and utilities, 3/4 of extremely low income renter households have less than half of their income left for life’s necessities, like food, transportation and healthcare.

As dire as this situation sounds (and is), there are rays of hope when it comes to policy solutions. As the Times explains, the National Housing Trust Fund, when funded, will “create affordable housing, through rehabilitation or construction” that will end the affordable housing shortage and build on the successful efforts our nation has already made to stem the tide of homelessness.

There are two funding sources for the National Housing Trust Fund that have great potential: contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the savings from reform of the mortgage interest deduction into a credit that will benefit more middle and lower income homeowners.

The basis for proposing these two funding sources is simple: the federal government makes a significant investment in making home ownership easy for people who can already afford high-quality housing. It’s time for the government to put its housing money where the need for housing is greatest.

Think this is an idea you can endorse? You can do that right here.

Leave a comment

Filed under Policy Focus

News Round-Up: Making Housing a Priority

Our first news round-up of 2013 brings you stories of a big push to provide greater funding for affordable housing, and some very real reasons why that housing is so important.

First, to reasons: In The Nation we read about the connection between safe, decent housing and educational success. According to the post, “Children who lack stable homes are more anxious and less focused than their peers who have adequate housing. They are also at higher risk for poor health and developmental problems, and have lower educational attainment,” which are cited as reasons to finally fund the National Housing Trust Fund.

In a story from April re-posted on Christmas Eve, Crosscut explores what life is like for unemployed, homeless people who live at a highway rest stop outside of Seattle. The author notes that the Housing Wage in Washington State is so high that even if one of the gentlemen she interviews manages to have his application for SSI accepted, he will not earn enough to afford a modest apartment in that state.

As The Nation noted, the National Housing Trust Fund would be part of the solution to homelessness in America, but it is still without a funding source. Housing Affairs Letter and The Hill both report that Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) introduced a bill in December that would fund the National Housing Trust Fund, among other housing programs, through a reform of the mortgage interest deduction.

The National Low Income Housing Coalition proposes a reform to the mortgage interest deduction that would make mortgage tax breaks work for middle and lower income families, while providing the level of funding the National Housing Trust Fund would need to end homelessness in 10 years.

Leave a comment

Filed under News round-up

News Round-Up: Funding Housing, Ending Homelessness

Sunday morning, MSNBC’s Melissa Harris-Perry hosted a wide-ranging discussion on the aspects of America’s housing crisis that don’t get the attention they deserve: namely, housing discrimination, the impact of foreclosure on renters and the shortage of housing affordable to the lowest income Americans.

In the discussion’s first segment, panelists James Perry, former NLIHC board member and Executive Director of the Greater New Orleans Fair Housing Action Center; Sheila Crowley, President and CEO of the National Low Income Housing Coalition; Jonathan Capehart, opinion writer for the Washington Post; and Victoria DeFrancesco Soto, a fellow at the Center for Politics and Governance at the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas discussed predatory mortgage lending aimed at communities of color. The panelists also noted the over-investment in and skewed focus on home ownership in the United States.

The focus of the second part of the discussion was foreclosure and its impact on communities of color, and on renters. As Ms. Crowley noted, NLIHC has found that 40% of households impacted by foreclosure are renters.

The segment closed with a discussion of the National Housing Trust Fund, which if fully funded could end homelessness in the United States. Panelists agreed that it is time to rebalance federal housing policy so it no longer provides disproportionate benefit to higher income homeowners at the expense of the lowest income families.

Host Melissa Harris-Perry concluded that mayors should strongly support housing tax reform and an investment in the National Housing Trust Fund as it would result in an investment in the exact communities that had been wrenched apart by the foreclosure crisis. We can end homelessness, she said, and not to do it would be a violation of who we are as Americans.

Leave a comment

Filed under News round-up